A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to build their family dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such parts are subject to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological outcomes, particularly in the delicate coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, the place views of the sea are the two highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-higher water all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Assemble Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been included in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant from the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, continues to be described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is determined by issue for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private check out, insisting alternatively that it's about guaranteeing that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple basically trying to make a family residence in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be carried out determined by Experienced advice and accepted strategies. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea all through a storm, never alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming additional contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had Formerly been linked to area advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o during a Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should Are living together with each other long following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.