A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving prospective neighbours about the development of a wall in a coastal internet site within a north Dublin suburb, a case that has captivated nationwide awareness next an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental fears, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Instances write-up about René Collier as well as Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a remarkably publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above development operates at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a firm director respectively, look for to build their household household. The case is becoming emblematic of wider disputes along Ireland’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of established people. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying manufactured by their potential neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted underneath setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their arranging authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, bringing about an encroachment over a Specific Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as a result parts are subject to demanding controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, especially inside of a sensitive coastal atmosphere including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which is partially constructed, is in the proper situation. Their authorized group has characterised the action as an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their see, an allegation that's been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are both of those remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In line with sworn proof referenced in the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-large h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations, a picture which has considering the fact that become emblematic of your depth from the dispute. These steps weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to Obtain visual evidence on the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Occasions documented, describing how the two Adult males entered the h2o in the course of significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the location became One of the more placing descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of actions had been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into a place influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately with the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the history and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to more submissions on whether interim orders really should be granted to halt construction pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential moment while in the lawful timeline.
In the Main in the dispute can be a disagreement around boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as created, goes further than what was approved and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has been described as meticulous in his evaluation of setting up files, maps, and conditions hooked up on the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their action is motivated by problem for environmental security and adherence to planning regulation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal perspective, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that improvement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've described their lengthy-standing relationship to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair basically trying to establish a family members property in accordance Along with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches over a Unique Space of Conservation and say that each one works are already completed dependant on Experienced guidance and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with coming into the sea in the course of a storm, will not alter the underlying points.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how preparing disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute around development of wall at coastal site happens to be a shorthand description for any predicament a large number of observers see as more and more frequent. As sea stages increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has become more contentious.
The Irish Situations article about René Collier noted the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to nearby advocacy on organizing and environmental issues, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly various Specialist backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, became synonymous with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods and René Collier waded by way of midsection-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical fact on the coastline as well as symbolic character of the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an too much strategy.
Because the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays unsure. The court docket must decide whether the wall as developed complies with preparing authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and arranging circumstances. Nevertheless the René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times human component stays central: neighbours who will have to Are living together with one another lengthy following the legal costs happen to be paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over building will work at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, although the implications of the case lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. What's more, it underscores how quickly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental concerns including environmental protection and residence rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a spot of organic attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre of the dispute stands partly built, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. Regardless of whether it can eventually be altered, removed, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court’s results. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will likely continue to seem in headlines, joined indelibly to Just about the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent years.